Archive for July, 2008

Another unintended consequence of using the wrong measures

Posted in Pay-for-Performance with tags on July 20, 2008 by Jerry

A post by Guy Kawasaki reminded me of another unintended consequence of using the wrong measures (see the Unintended Consequences post from 5/15). Actually, Guy was commenting on a video of Malcolm Gladwell (The Tipping Point) discussing the pits falls of today’s hiring practices. Using the wrong criteria in your selection process could lead to disastrous results. With today’s technology, we are in data overload. For many, many things, we can have so much data available to us that we cannot possibly digest it all. What’s more, much of the data conflicts with other data, which then leads to analysis paralysis.

So what is the solution? There is no one solution, but taking careful time to think through all the different roads that a certain type of data could lead you to, before you start collecting the data, could head off potential problems down the road.

Accountability in the Workplace Tip #4 – Goals and Expectations

Posted in Raising Accountability Tips with tags , , on July 11, 2008 by Jerry

Setting SMART Goals and Clear Expectations are an essential part of the process of achieving higher levels of accountability with your peers and employees. Goals must be determined before expectations can be set and Expectations have to be set before someone can be held accountable for meeting them. Often we use the terms Goals and Expectations interchangeably. This happens most often when expectations are implied during the goal setting process. For example, when setting the goal to reduce errors in a process by 25% there is an implied expectation: you make 25% less mistakes. However, there are significant differences between goals and expectations. A Goal is something to strive for; a target to reach but it is not an obligation other than the obligation to try. An Expectation on the other hand
is an obligation considered reasonable, due and necessary. In performance management terms, the expectation is the minimum acceptable performance level and a goal is some point beyond the expectation that the manager and employee have agreed to target. Going forward from here, I will talk setting goals and expectation and the process for both are nearly the same as long as you keep in mind the differences: Targets vs. Obligations.

The goal and expectation setting process is not a complicated one. It can be difficult to pick the absolute right point to place as a goal or expectation, but in most cases it is less critical to be absolutely correct than it is to get a goal set and get commitments to striving to those goals. If you follow the guidelines for setting SMART goals, you should be fine. Many books, papers and websites give great detail to setting SMART goals but I’ll run through the basics. First the acronym:

S – Specific
    M – Measurable
    A – Attainable
    R – Relevant
    T – Time bound

Specific:

Both Goals and Expectations should be very clear, unambiguous and specific. There is no place for vagrancies when setting goals because a specific objective has a much greater chance of being accomplished. Specificity also facilitates measuring progress towards achievement. In the context of developing goals, Specific means that an observable and quantifiable action, behavior or result is described which is also linked to a measure of some type such as a rate, number, or percentage. Using the previous error rate goal as an example it is not enough to say our goal is to reduce errors. The goal should be quantified more specifically. To do so, you and the employee(s) need to answer and agree to six “W” questions:

Who: Who is involved?
What: What do we want to accomplish?
Where: Identify a location.
When: Establish a time frame.
Which: Identify requirements and constraints.
Why: Specific reasons, purpose or benefits of accomplishing the goal

Measurable:

The old adage is that if you don’t measure it, you can’t control it. What good is a goal that you cannot tell if any progress is being made on it? So to be effective you must create a tracking system to measure progress on reaching the goal that provides feedback in a timely basis. Let’s use a real life example that nearly all companies want to improve upon – Customer Satisfaction. Everyone wants to improve on customer satisfaction. But how do you measure customer satisfaction in a way that is measurable in real time so that feedback can be given to the people that are trying to improve? Typical measurements are surveys that can take weeks to get back therefore delaying feedback for periods much too long to effect any real change. When facing this challenge, break the overall goal down into more manageable buckets. What are the controllable components of customer satisfaction that your employees directly control that can be measured? If you in a call center environment it could be things like:

  • Time to call resolution
  • Number of call escalations
  • Number customer calls per issue

One note of caution goes back to a previous post: select the right measurement or you may get the wrong result.

Attainable:

Both Goals and Expectations should be achievable. Since expectations are obligatory, they have to be doable. That does not mean that they have to be easy but you must put people in a position to be successful or you are dooming them, and you, to failure. Goals, on the other, should stretch people more than expectations. They still should be achievable, even if it takes what for the individual is a herculean effort. Beyond this, the goal becomes ridiculous and it actually becomes a demotivator and a source of dissension in your organization.

Relevant:

Goals and expectations should be relevant to both the individual and the organization. A goal for which an employee has no influence upon is again worse than irrelevant, it is a distraction and a demotivator. Setting a goal or expectation to increase sales on a production line worker is not only irrelevant it is not attainable.

Time Bound:

Both goals and expectations need to have distinct starting and ending points. If the goal has a significant duration (this will vary by what the goal is) then a series of milestones should be defined. This increases the sense of urgency for accomplishing the objectives. Human nature being what it is, most people wait until the last moment to get things done. By setting a series of short interval milestones, then you can help the employee be successful by ensuring that they are taking incremental steps in achieving the overall goal or expectation.

When Goals are not needed:

There are also many times when goals are not needed in order to set expectations. Would you really go through a goal setting exercise in order to set the expectation that someone is to come to work on time? No. Nor should you. Some things in the workplace are not or nor should they be negotiable. Honesty, integrity, reliability, loyalty are all attributes that should be simple expectations in any organization that are framed in goals. These are pure obligations that come with employment or membership in the organization. A job description is another example of expectations that are not necessarily tied to goals. A job description states the minimum expectation of someone filling a certain role.

Tip # 5 will pick back up where Tip #3 left off in the process of improving workplace accountability.

Accountability in the Workplace Tip #3

Posted in Accountability, Raising Accountability Tips with tags , on July 7, 2008 by Jerry

In this article, we will be focusing on the initial steps to begin changing the behaviors that lead to a higher level of accountability. For this article, we will assume that you are the official leader of this group; i.e. you are the boss. Being the boss makes it much easier to drive behavior changes but that does not mean that you cannot do it if you are not the boss. It just takes longer and you must think more strategically. We will cover tips for the non-boss later on in this series. We will also assume that you have read Tips 1 & 2 and have begun implementing the suggestions from those articles. This piece builds squarely on those two steps so if you have not read those tips then I suggest you do so now.

At this point you should be personally demonstrating a higher level of accountability yourself and have built a consensus among your staff and employees that change is needed in their behavior. Now you need to take positive steps to create the beginnings of group wide change. First, tell them as a group what you are going to do and ask for their help in accomplishing it. What you are going to do is to do a better job of developing SMART Goals, setting clear expectations around those goals and following up on a regular, timely and proactive basis. What you need their help in is developing and agreeing to those SMART Goals, asking questions to ensure that expectations are clear, and be ready with real answers when you follow-up. You will need to explain in detail what each of those steps entails and how it will affect them personally. We will come back to each one of these items and address them separately so that you understand them yourself. As I have stated several times in the other tips, this is a lifestyle change. You and every member of your group will have to do things differently.

Next, you want to schedule a one-on-one meeting with each individual on your team. During this meeting, you will need to confirm their support. They will need to understand that you are going to be asking more of them and that you will be following up on a more frequent basis. This does not mean that you have lost faith in them or that they are doing anything wrong. What it means is that you are interested in their being successful in accomplishing their goals, that the only way you can help them is to ask questions, and for them to be forthcoming about their progress and the problems they are encountering in accomplishing those tasks. Once agreement and support has been achieved, then delve into the goals development and the setting of expectations. The individual meetings require planning. The more time spent on planning the meeting, the shorter and more productive the meeting will be. As a rule of thumb, meetings of this type should take an equal amount of time to plan as to execute. In other words planning for a half hour meeting should take about a half hour. A little longer for the first couple and a little less as you develop your theme and rhythm. While planning the meeting consider the individual and their strengths and weaknesses, how they are performing currently and what you want the outcome of the meeting to be. You should define in writing what goals do you want them to agree to, and how are you going to position them to reach those goals. Putting it in writing will help you clarify it in your mind and increase your resolve to get that outcome. You should also list out your expectations in writing so that you don’t forget to cover a critical point. You cannot hold someone accountable to an expectation you never set. At the end of the meeting, you should summarize the goals and expectations and get verbal agreement as to what was agreed upon. Immediately following the meeting, those items should be documented in writing and a copy given to the employee for their records.

In Tip #4, we will take a step back and review how to set SMART goals and clear expectations.